The whole framing analyzing LLMs as if they were humans is completely off, laughable.
LLMs have no agenda and no feelings. We should stop pushing everything through an human-centric lens. LLMs will world-build if that’s the bias you put in, and often even if you don’t.
This article read like Claude output placed inside massive ads. 0 value above telling Claude to summarize the source for me. Except, the source was not linked as article link.
Claude Code let's you add/change it's output style.
On the article: the author seems to be overly sensitive to remarks made by an LLM. Instead of looking inward and finding out why that bothered them in the first place and grow, they "fire" the tool.
If you are just looking to massage the numbers so there are more first homes vs second homes percentage-wise without creating new first homes, then taxing luxury second homes may work. It has great potential to change the numbers on a spreadsheet.
Decreasing the number of secondary homes for the wealthy _does not_ create more first homes people can realistically afford though.
This guy fails to communicate properly how others can and should contribute to his project. I see this all the time where the standards of a project aren't properly documented so the reviewer/maintainer just wastes time reviewing the same thing thousands of times until they give up.