Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | DSingularity's commentslogin

Its 256k context window. Quantization is orthogonal. We cant really tell directly so it could be quantized.


He’s explaining that the magic is baked into the harness. It’s the prompts as much as it is the model.


...which is why they were able to withdraw access to that tool, yes. You're just clarifying but the original comment here is deeply confused, IMHO.


It’s unlikely to stop here. Today is a proprietary 5T parameter model, tomorrow it’s 5 100B parameter models that each specialize to specific applications and you can run them on your phone. The direction of travel is not like you think. The real victim will be medium to large software companies that can no longer rely on the difficulty of reproducing or maintaining or hosting their software as moat.


Once you notice the pattern of how these companies are started you will see that there is a hidden hand of government behind much of what we think is an independent, market driven, capitalistic enterprise. Whether it’s Facebook or Oracle or Palantir or SpaceX it’s all the same. Heck even the founding of Silicon Valley itself can be viewed to be government driven. The bottom line is national security is not going to be left to the whims of a market when the pentagon has a black budget that can eclipse all of VC spending with the stroke of a generals pen.


This is a totally accurate post. It’s amazing how many free market zealots aren’t aware of the government foundation under SV. They think they sprout all wealth creation on their own because they are just that brilliant.


While there's some truth to this, the early investments in Palantir and Facebook from In-Q-Tel were tiny. For Palantir, the contracts with a single government agency were far more capital than the investment.


I think these things can be equivalent. It all depends on the definition of wait.

The simple example can be x86 with monitor/mwait instructions. These will suspend a hardware thread until it can be awoken when the memory write happens to the monitored address. Nothing happens on that cpu thread in the meanwhile. Yet at the same time if things are being virtualized the higher authority exists and it can do something else with the CPU until the write. Same for OS type of event synchronization like Linux futex.

I would argue that the wait abstraction is more powerful. The alternative isn’t powerful enough to enable these kinds of “wake me when I can be useful again” behaviors.


Of course that is logical but you really should learn to distrust your logic. Logic can easily end up leading you to antisemitic ideas. Same with humanitarian ideas about Palestinians and such. It’s best if you just let the Zionists do as they will without any criticism.


How antisemitic. You aren’t allowed to critique them. Yes even if they rape their prisoners and defend their rapists in parliament and on TV.


"We will build an ethnostate and if you don't like that, you're a Nazi."


The good people of israel? You mean the citizen army that carried out the genocide? I am sure they really hate their government but probably because they think its not doing enough.


Thank you!


nope. I cant upvote it either. @dang


Could you please email us (hn@ycombinator.com) a screenshot of what you see here?

https://news.ycombinator.com/upvoted?id=DSingularity


dang is very active and often sees these @'s, but there isn't actually any notification-like behavior on HN (or at least there wasn't a year ago). I've emailed hn@ycombinator to let them know there might be some bug here.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: