remember Barbra Streisand?

> despite holding more information than most password managers

what?

I don't think most people realize what information they are making available to their AI agents & where it will end up.

It’s not more important information than a password manager, it’s just more.

It's got more information than my bank account details too. Talk about nonsense...

Codex just started downloading an update and it's gone. It removed itself.

I guess it's supposed to be a part of ChatGPT now, but I cannot see any update there yet.

btw I kinda hate this, because ChatGPT was always very slow for me - possibly due to amount of historical threads I have there

Ok, I had to re-download Codex from OpenAI's webpage and click update again. Now it's actually different, but I must say it was all a bit confusing.

I agree with the whole premise, but isn't this a bit hypocritical? I mean, this website looks almost like what Claude outputs on average

This would be huge

Anyone interested in this should really try out Homerow (https://www.homerow.app)

(not affiliated, just a happy user for years now)

How do you handle apps that don't have great accessibility support?

Hell - after installing, it shows a slider to help adjust the label size of each element - but I can't slide it because (surprise) Homerow doesn't support horizontal slider elements like this.

I also can't highlight text on the screen etc.

Struggling to find a usecase for Homerow that isn't just navigating chrome or my filesystem.

But that is Mac only.

*GLM 5.1

I'm using AI every day (and it's not really about AI), but:

Anyone else closed the article immediately after seeing the low-taste, sloppy image at the top?

How do you call this aesthetic? "Futuristic vomit"? AKA "Generate image of: code blocks, AI-brain image, diagram, smiling guy and bunch of other crap. Make it look cool and futuristic, make no mistakes"?

robot to replace a robot

You inferred this from the photo?

> He is presumed to be agnostic, heterosexual, and politically aligned with the Democratic party

If you believe this study [1], humans can guess party affiliation at least slightly better than random chance from images alone.

Or [2] is an (unscientific) exploration from the other direction, prompting image generation models to make images of republican and democrat voters, with very different results

1: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2807452/

2. https://rooftopsquad.com/democrat-vs-republican-faces/

Presumably, everything you have done publicly (and hence your personality) exists somewhere in the big Google neural network. It gets compressed into one of the many billion weights. It might be hard to decompress it into useful information. But it is there nonetheless. Just showing your face might trigger and activate some layers in there.

Just my hypothesis.

> politically aligned with the Democratic party

That's sometimes possible (e.g. the "Trump woman" look, or certain "I know it when I see it" stylistic cues mainly displayed by progressive women that I can't really articulate). Polarization has turned political alignment into subculture, and members of subcultures often dress certain ways (and not necessarily consciously).