> In plan mode (using CC, or OpenCode) I ask a model to build the foundational knowledge for X topic. I ask it to review the accuracy of the knowledge base it built in the previous step.
> What you get is a beautiful animation that is 100% accurate and free of hallucinations.
The circular cost indicator near the context usage indicator was also removed. It is so much easier to accidentally leave an expensive model enabled now and not realize it until you have blown through the included credits. And it is hard to imagine that that wasn’t the point of the change.
The way you use commits sounds like how I tend to use stacked PRs at work. Good commit hygiene is hard to enforce at a team level, but for whatever reason at the PR level people are happy to write good descriptions and keep the sets of changes tidy.
This is purely a function of what people expect to be looked at.... if your team started looking at each individual commit step by step, then you'd probably find that people started paying more attention to how their commit hygiene looks.
One thing I have is a series of machine written expository articles about narrow topics that were really intended for me to help learning and development, those could definitely be shared with the right context. Eventually I'd like to write something as well. I should probably put together a blog subdomain.
