I certainly hope so.

But LLMs do not need to change that. Sufficient marketing can change the perception of decision takers and middle managers to: Oooh, they can do that.

That is all that it takes.

Cool. Thanks for sharing this.

I wander what it does for different objects.

Oups a ball crossed the street 15m ahead. Let's slowdown to a crawl and watch for the kid is what a human would do.

I suppose they may have special cased the ball case.

This is not my understanding by reading the article. The blade failure will destroy the plane if developed independently of the rest. So modern nacelles will contain the blast as you say but they have decades of integration testing together with the blades in all kind of conditions.

if you develop everything anew there will be mismatches in tolerances and thousands of potential individual failure risks that can be combined in interesting, unexpected and fatal ways.

Hi there,

I am here to answer questions and provide clarifications.

This sounds kinda premeditated though...

Maybe walk back and forth a bit dragging your feet on said carpet and open your pc for ‘maintenance’ and accidentally fry some critical component?

and that's how you learn...

Shooting yourself in the foot really helps to built intuition!

It is probably easier these days when you have a phone to fall back on for if you break the internet on your computer.

Playing with your router is still a pain though, especially if you don't have a device with an Ethernet port. You learn all sorts of fun things like "If you change your router's IP address you get logged out of its management at the old IP address" and "Oh, that's what subnet mask means, weird."

> It is probably easier these days when you have a phone to fall back on

Most definitely. The old lessons were hard learned, and they stayed with you. Going through everything, trying all the combinations, and reading obscure materials for any hints.

I don't want to glorify the old hard way of spending perhaps days on problems that ended up being trivial, but it's obviously different now when one can get all the answers and helpful scripts directly from LLMs. Much less is retained.

Sometimes called "high instructional value".

wprs? Does not work for mac yet IIRC...

In the same sense windows are not network transparent when in fact RDP works perfectly, certainly much better that X11 over WAN.

Actually for wayland there is wprs for remote display of apps so here it goes the network transparency argument...

I have used X11 over WAN and it worked fine. Even connecting to a different country, which a significantly slower connection than I have now.

I do not know the current state of RDP etc., but does it allow you to open a single application rather than an entire desktop on Linux, and does it display correctly for the device you are using rather than the one the app is running on?

Only certain Linux RDP clients support per-app windows and I'm not sure how to actually set that up on Linux (only used WinBoat which is a Windows host and does all the Linux config automatically)

like the web and we saw how that went... Oh wait!

I'm not sure what point you thought you were making. The web is a complete mess.

I can't count the number of things that either no longer work or no longer even exist at all because of nothing other than the fragmented and ever-changing nature of the web. Aside from sites and apps that required flash or silverlight, I have several different pieces of expensive aactual hardware that either partially or wholly became unusable because the built in and non-updatable web interface requires an old version of java or activex.

Indeed we do all know how that went. It went like to total dogshit.