slow down in investment will happen only when token usage plateaus, until then companies will keep pouring money into this fire pit

thats probably why they open sourced it and fix some reputation issue on top of it

You have to put them into a RULES.md of course!

That's the only file on your computer the AI won't read.

if they release training dataset, they will be in trouble for copyright reasons

I thought it was pretty accurate tbh.

this is mostly in tech. starbucks barista is not going to get any stocks

Starbucks sells its stock to its baristas at a 5% discount every 90 days through payroll deductions.

https://www.starbucksbenefits.com/en-us/home/stock-savings/s...

The barista can buy $SBUX every payday. The inverse of sell on vest.

yes, in few weeks.unfortunately the stock will be back from this slump

Ummm probably not. Lock ups are going to dump far more stock into the market.

But they are going to coincide lockups with the release of additional stock float from 5% up to 20% of the total "valuation" with a 3x QQQ multiplier so that stock indexes will treat them as 60% float even though 2/3rds of those shares are unavailable. Thus they guarantee that even more shares must be bought by tracking ETFs and institutional buyers. Everybody (that already owns pre-IPO shares) wins!

But that's not a secret, and therefore already priced in, right?

It's also a tiny effect given the total-market funds buy small amounts of each company, and the NASDAQ 100 isn't particularly big.

If S&P had changed its rules for the S&P 500, there would have been an effect. In the end, the drama was almost entirely a spectacle for finance influencers and their viewers.

QQQ is the largest of the Nasdaq100 tracking funds. It's only about 1%, increasing to 4% of the QQQ, which is ~$350B in size. So it's only $3.5B of forced buying or a little less that 5% (of $75B). For the second float would be and additional ~$14B, again about 5%.

all he needs to do is put a competent CEO

Agreed that Zuck is not very impressive, but what would another CEO do differently at this point? It's got a ton of money, and they are trying this and that. But the market wouldn't let them sit on a bunch of money either.

1. Rename the company to "Facebook"

2. Spin out the other garbage into different companies.

linkedin is not a $3T company though.