Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

To be fair, you're going to have to take rest stops of that kind of length for a 1000 mile drive.


True, but you may not want to leave your vehicle plugged in by itself for 30 ~ 60 minutes. I guess you could get food and eat it in/around the car while it charged...


I think that is partially the idea with supercharger stations--that there will be amenities nearby within eyeshot of the cars.

I think it'd be cool to have coffee shops or a lounge setting where you can use your computer in a relaxed environment while you make sure nobody messes with your car.

But honestly, when on a road trip with family, I am lucky to have a stop as short as 1 hour if we are eating a meal.


The charger cable locks into the charging port while the car is locked, so no one is going to mess with it while you're gone.


> so no one is going to mess with it while you're gone.

Rrriiiiggght. No one would ever key the paint work, slash the tires, (attempt to) hack the onboard systems of, or vomit into an unattended luxury car.

A better argument would be that the car is being charged on camera at a human attended station that takes security seriously.


Rrriiiggght. People driving BMW's always stay in their cars or park them human attended parkinglots that take security seriously - if someone doesn't, then it usually results in keyed paint work, slashed tires or vomit in your car.


Everything you mentioned except the somewhat silly "attempt to hack the onboard systems [in a half hour]" is stuff that ICE luxury cars are just as subject to. Save for the possible novelty thrill of messing up an electric car vs. a combustion one, this risk isn't increased at all.


I said nothing about increased risk, I addressed the issue of the car being "safe" for the 30 minutes or longer that it takes to charge simply because "The charger cable locks into the charging port while the car is locked, so no one is going to mess with it while you're gone."

As for "novelty value and thrill" well, yes, it's stupid, pointless, and exactly the kind of dumb arse flash fad that has happened in the past and could well happen in the future - there's no logic to such things.


If there is no increased risk, then it is "safe" relative to the normal baseline for "safe" that most people would apply to a car. Pointing out that it is not safe in some unrealistic absolute sense is kind of pointless, don't you think?

It's like telling someone that a neighborhood he's thinking of moving into is unsafe without mentioning that your assessment based on the fact that the neighborhood is as likely as any other to get hit by a meteor. That doesn't qualify it as an "unsafe neighborhood" on the scale most people care about.


Why wouldn't you want to do that? I leave my car parked in places that I'm not all the time.


I don't leave my car unattended while fuelling it. I realize that you would leave your car unattended for other things.


I assume that you don't leave it unattended since someone could start stealing the gas which you are paying for?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: