Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

On the other hand, Brody has known record of exaggeration and distortion of truth. Whereas Musk is an honest, no-nonsense engineer. (Although I'd be interested if you could point me to a situation where Musk was caught blatantly lying about something.)


Musk is a business man and is concerned about marketing as much as anyone else. Here are his comments aimed toward the Volt:

"Yet the state of the electric car is dismal, the victim of hyped expectations, technological flops, high costs and a hostile political climate.”

Not exactly and objective view, or totally fair.


Uh, that was said by Broder in one of his previous articles.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/sunday-review/the-electric...


You're right. I was equating that quote and the calling-the-Volt-a-"lawnmower" quote (http://articles.businessinsider.com/2009-05-11/green_sheet/2...) together. I was reading about them yesterday. My mistake.


You're seriously suggesting that Musk is entirely objective here? About a project he has invest millions in?


If that is that case, Musk would have known about his alleged "agenda" before handing over the keys for the review and could have acted accordingly. But he didn't.


I don't think Musk has the time to do background checks on every media person who wants to test-drive a vehicle. And the supposedly credible reputation of NYTimes may also have led him to trust Broder. In his blog post however he admits that he made a mistake there.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: