Those are in the 10 of the worst states, and they're the worst cities in each of the states, all but SF with their own, special, even worse laws (California has preemption, which means SF gun law is a constant of wack-a-mole, although of course they issue concealed carry licenses just about never, e.g. exactly 1 last year, to a jewler).
I was born, raised, and have retired to Missouri, which once it shook off its "KKK" post-Civil War anti-gun laws in the last decade has ... well, kept up with the rest of the "good" states. When I lived in Arlington, Virginia it was also good. Massachusetts for college and work for a dozen years ... not good at all, much worse today.
So due to the wonders of Federalism I believe I've lived in a free society since 1991; you, obviously not so much. And it's not a month to month thing, e.g. NY's Sullivan Act comes from 1911, when the Irish NYC Tammany Hall machine wanted to keep newer immigrants in their place.
But I agree its a very big problem, about 1/3 of our nation's population are by definition subjects, not citizens, and this makes me think about Lincoln's "'A house divided against itself cannot stand.' I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free."
As for the political convention, I suspect you and I have different definitions of "peaceably assemble", plus I see no inherent issues with suppressing protests at a political convention. That's not what I understand that part of the 1st Amendment to be protecting, rather, it e.g. protects each of the conventions, where people are peaceably assembling as part of politics. I submit to you that it is at least a debatable point.
I was born, raised, and have retired to Missouri, which once it shook off its "KKK" post-Civil War anti-gun laws in the last decade has ... well, kept up with the rest of the "good" states. When I lived in Arlington, Virginia it was also good. Massachusetts for college and work for a dozen years ... not good at all, much worse today.
So due to the wonders of Federalism I believe I've lived in a free society since 1991; you, obviously not so much. And it's not a month to month thing, e.g. NY's Sullivan Act comes from 1911, when the Irish NYC Tammany Hall machine wanted to keep newer immigrants in their place.
But I agree its a very big problem, about 1/3 of our nation's population are by definition subjects, not citizens, and this makes me think about Lincoln's "'A house divided against itself cannot stand.' I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free."
As for the political convention, I suspect you and I have different definitions of "peaceably assemble", plus I see no inherent issues with suppressing protests at a political convention. That's not what I understand that part of the 1st Amendment to be protecting, rather, it e.g. protects each of the conventions, where people are peaceably assembling as part of politics. I submit to you that it is at least a debatable point.