"1b. The candidate has proposed a radical restructuring of our tax system to include time worked at a company - something already accounted for by raises due to hard work - making it expensive for California's workforce to move to better jobs. That sounds un-American to me. The candidate has yet to show a single shred of solid independent evidence that this is even a problem, let alone that he has a solution for it."
I'd read the proposal as "[short/long] positions", not "[job] positions". I'm curious to know which the parent intended.
Probably, for sure. I wouldn't quite rule out "capital gains on equity you are awarded for holding a [job] position" entirely, but I do think it unlikely.
I'd read the proposal as "[short/long] positions", not "[job] positions". I'm curious to know which the parent intended.